**Low Thia Khiang Asks Why WP Delayed Lie Reveal**

muazhan

You need 2 min read

·

Post on Oct 24, 2024

51 visitor like this post

Share

Low Thia Khiang Asks Why WP Delayed Lie Reveal: A Case of Political Strategy or Miscalculation?

Singapore's political landscape has been shaken by a recent revelation: the Workers' Party (WP) admitting to a delay in disclosing a lie told by one of its candidates during the 2020 General Election. The admission came after a public outcry and calls for transparency, fueled by the revelation that a candidate had misrepresented his credentials.

The question on everyone's lips now is: why did the WP delay disclosing this information?

Low Thia Khiang, former WP Secretary-General, has voiced his own concerns, asking for a clear explanation from the party leadership. In a statement released on social media, he expressed his disappointment, stating, "The revelation of the lie and the subsequent delay in addressing it have caused much public disappointment and raised serious questions about the Party's commitment to transparency and accountability."

The WP's explanation:

The WP has stated that they delayed revealing the lie to avoid disrupting the campaigning period and to focus on the main election issues. They also maintained that the lie was made by a single candidate, and that it did not affect the outcome of the election.

However, many see this explanation as insufficient.

Here are some key arguments being raised:

• Damage Control vs. Transparency: Critics argue that delaying the truth ultimately caused more damage to the party's reputation than an immediate confession would have.
• Public Trust Eroded: The delay has also been seen as a betrayal of public trust, especially after the WP's constant emphasis on integrity and transparency.
• Lack of Leadership: Some believe that the leadership's hesitation in addressing the issue reflects a lack of decisive action and potentially a reluctance to hold the erring candidate accountable.

Moving Forward:

The WP's decision to finally reveal the truth, however belated, is a positive step.

However, the party now needs to do more to regain public trust. This includes:

• A thorough investigation into the incident and the decision-making process.
• A clear and unambiguous explanation for the delay.
• Appropriate disciplinary action against the candidate.
• A commitment to stronger internal procedures to prevent such incidents in the future.

This incident serves as a stark reminder that transparency and accountability are crucial, not only for political parties but also for any organization seeking to maintain public trust. The WP's handling of this situation will have long-term consequences for its image and future prospects.

The question remains: was the delay a strategic move or a miscalculation? The WP must now demonstrate its commitment to ethical leadership and demonstrate the necessary steps to regain public confidence.