**Low Thia Khiang Questions WP's Delay In Exposing Lie**

muazhan

You need 3 min read

·

Post on Oct 24, 2024

57 visitor like this post

Share

Low Thia Khiang Questions WP's Delay in Exposing Lie: A Case of Political Opportunism?

Singapore's political landscape has been buzzing with the recent revelations surrounding a purportedly fabricated Workers' Party (WP) social media post. The controversy, which centers around a post claiming that the People's Action Party (PAP) was planning to remove the Elected President's veto power, has sparked a wave of accusations and counter-accusations. Amidst this storm, former WP stalwart, Low Thia Khiang, has raised a pointed question: Why did the WP wait so long to expose the alleged lie?

The Allegations and the Backlash:

The initial post, appearing on a Facebook page attributed to the WP, alleged that the PAP was planning to remove the President's veto power, a move that would have significant implications for Singapore's political system. The WP swiftly denounced the post as fake, attributing it to an imposter account and claiming they had reported the issue to Facebook. However, the damage had been done. The allegations sparked a wave of criticism, with some accusing the WP of using the fake post to gain political advantage.

Low Thia Khiang's Scathing Critique:

Low Thia Khiang, a former Secretary-General of the WP, has expressed his disappointment with the party's handling of the incident. In a Facebook post of his own, he wrote: "Why wait so long to expose the lie? Why not expose the lie immediately?" He went on to suggest that the delay in exposing the alleged fake post raised questions about the WP's motivations. He argued that the party's response, coming only after the controversy had gained momentum, could be seen as a case of political opportunism.

Political Opportunism and the WP's Response:

The accusations of political opportunism have resonated with some observers. The WP's initial silence, followed by its swift denouncement of the post after the allegations gained traction, has raised eyebrows. Some have suggested that the party may have strategically waited to capitalize on the controversy, using it to further their own agenda.

The WP has refuted these claims, emphasizing that they took swift action to address the fake post. They have also argued that the delay in exposing the lie was due to the time taken to verify the authenticity of the Facebook page.

The Lasting Impact:

The controversy surrounding the purportedly fabricated WP social media post has left a lasting mark on Singapore's political landscape. The accusations and counter-accusations have further strained relations between the PAP and WP, highlighting the deep-seated divisions that exist within Singapore's political system.

Moving forward, it remains to be seen how this incident will impact the WP's reputation and its standing within the Singaporean electorate. The controversy has also raised concerns about the spread of misinformation online and the need for greater vigilance in combating fake news.

In conclusion, Low Thia Khiang's questioning of the WP's delay in exposing the alleged lie has reignited a debate about political motivations and the use of social media in Singapore's political discourse. This incident underscores the importance of responsible online behavior and the need for political parties to maintain transparency and accountability in their actions.